|
Informal
responses
For each class you
will post (at the BEGINNING of the class time) your responses to the assigned
readings and any on-line materials. We will spend the class period (whether
you are on-line elsewhere or in Hibbs 329) reading each other's responses
and commenting on them, with everyone "talking, listening, and responding"
at once. The interactive forum/chat participation will be reviewed
and graded two times during the semester [10 course points each time].
Quantity, "time-on-task," and quality all play a part in the grade. 20
course points
Formal
papers
A.
Essays (3).
1. Your
"place" paper: a re-creation of an encounter with/in your "place"
in "nature."
This can be either in the past or the present (it might well come from
your first journaling), but it should include lots of juicy details about
a place and its meaning to you. You will have an opportunity to
revise after group feedback.
Here are some good papers from earlier classes. This is due to your
critique group in Blackboard on January 30 and a final revised version
is due to me a week later. Your critique of papers in your group is part
of your grade. [10 course points].
2.
Re-reading paper on Thoreau or Emerson.
In this paper you should focus on Walden or Nature
after studying the Web study texts. You may make connections to other
works we have read to this point, if appropriate. You should explore questions
raised by the study text and/or present and explore questions of
your own or raised in our discussions. ; you may also consider recurring
patterns. Your paper or portions of it may well be incorporated into the
on-line study text. (this means that you may explore several points fairly
briefly, not just one) The first draft is due to your group on February
17. You will have a week for group feedback on this paper before
I collect it for grading. Again, here are sample
papers in the lock folder.[10 course points]
3. Re-Reading
Paper and Class Review on a reading assignment during the semester
For this paper you will be the "class expert" on the readings
we have done for one class, taking our discussion to the next level. I
hope that you will offer several "starter" threads to begin
the discussion. You will "re-visit"the discussion forum(s), as well as
re-read the selected assignment you have chosen or been assigned (note
that many assignments cover more than one reading). You should review
all of the major points and issues we have discussed, including choice
quotations from us and the text, and any web sites will help us understand
the works. In short, analyze the range of ideas presented on the
work(s) and present your own interpretation of key issues, ideas, and/or
patterns. Do not summarize the works. The reviews will help the class
review for tests, etc. (and bring a bit of order to the chaos of class
discussion.) This paper should be written and sent to me within a week
of reading the work; I will link it to the syllabus before I grade it.
[of course, if you have a class in the final couple of weeks, you should
move more quickly!] You should choose which class you wish to review EARLY
in the semester. Here
is a good example. (in the "lock" folder). [10 course
points ]
B.
Mid-term exam (3).
An exploration and comparison of works that we have read to that point;
topic for this out-of-class portion will be posted in advance. There will
also be a brief in-class test on this material included in this grade
which will be given on February 21 in HIbbs 329. [15 course points]
C. Book
Review or Course Journal (4).
Most of our reading is made up of relatively short excerpts from longer
works. So, you need to read a full work (preferably by one of the writers
we are reading, especially if one really "pushes your buttons"!), perhaps
the book from which an excerpt comes. I have a number of these books for
borrowing, as does the library. For ideas on how to write this review,
see
these examples. Not only should you give a good idea of the style
and content of the work, but you should place it within the context of
our course (what other works is it similar to? What questions does it
pose and answer that other works also consider?) If you are choosing to
do this, you should e-mail me and we can talk about likely works. This
can be turned in at any time (why wait?), but is absolutely due before
April 28.
You have another option
on this assignment. You may keep a detailed journal throughout the course,
writing at least 3 times a week (you may also include sketches). These
would be your own careful and thoughtful observations of nature, right
here and now. We'll be reading some journals, so you can get an idea of
what you may do. You should bring the journal to me at the time of the
mid-term exam to make sure that you are on the right track. The final
journal is due to me by May 2 [final exam]. 10 course points
D. Your
major project (5).
You have several possibilities here, all for Web publication (you may
suggest other topics). These should be about 4-5 pages, and incorporate
research and/or field observation. You may choose to do this project as
a paper or as a web site (I'll help you with that). [15 course points]
Here are examples
of this assignment: [in the lock folder]
- You may write
your own nature essay which builds on observations and research from
a local place (this could build on journal entries). If you do
this, keep in mind a reader who has never seen Richmond or Virginia
(maybe not even the East Coast!).
- You may investigate
a particular environmental issue with local ties and write a persuasive/rhetorical
nature essay (this would include links to related Web sites as well
as your own accompanying documents).
D. Final
exam. This will draw specifically from class work on writers
in second half of course and cumulatively compare writers in terms of ideas,
style. Part of it may be done outside the exam time. Friday, May 2, 2-4
PM. 10 course points
Course Grading is on the 10-point scale.
|